Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:22

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sean McVay: Matthew Stafford-Davante Adams relationship is "cool to watch" - NBC Sports
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Do you think Taylor Swift will pay a price in the marketplace for endorsing Democrats?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Week in Review: Meta reveals its Oakley smart glasses - TechCrunch
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
CDC warns of deadly listeria outbreak tied to packaged meals - CIDRAP
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Jessie J breast cancer: singer undergoes surgery after diagnosis - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
With record crowd watching, Sky get blown out by Fever in first WNBA game at United Center - AP News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.